<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rug Pundits &#187; Qalandar Bux Memon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rugpundits.com/tag/qalandar-bux-memon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rugpundits.com</link>
	<description>From the other side of the fence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>reason vs. polemics &#8211; how Pakistani intellectuals face the looming US approach on their country</title>
		<link>http://rugpundits.com/2009/12/05/reason-vs-polemics-how-pakistani-intellectuals-face-the-looming-us-approach-on-their-country/</link>
		<comments>http://rugpundits.com/2009/12/05/reason-vs-polemics-how-pakistani-intellectuals-face-the-looming-us-approach-on-their-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Steiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmed Rashid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kilcullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manan Ahmed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Semple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nadeem Paracha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pervez Hoodbhoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qalandar Bux Memon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakchronicle.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qalandar Bux Memon has recently published an article commenting on Hillary Clinton&#8217;s visit and her statements in Pakistan. Read it here at the Samosa, but it was also published in DAWN and referred to by Yasir here. I recieved emails from Pakistani Leftist Political Activists who praised the article and I guess it was cheered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qalandar Bux Memon has recently published an article commenting on Hillary Clinton&#8217;s visit and her statements in Pakistan. Read it here at the <a href="http://www.thesamosa.co.uk/index.php/comment-and-analysis/politics/163-dear-hillary-which-pakistan-are-you-in-its-not-mine.html" target="_blank">Samosa</a>, but it was also published in <a href="http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/03-Dear-Hillary-which-Pakistan-are-you-talking-about-ss-01" target="_blank">DAWN</a> and referred to by Yasir <a href="http://pakchronicle.com/2009/11/24/dear-hillary-which-pakistan-are-you-talking-about/" target="_blank">here</a>. I recieved emails from Pakistani Leftist Political Activists who praised the article and I guess it was cheered by the conservatives and conspiracy theorists alike. He starts off with a cheap populist intro on how many Osamas and Mullah Omars may live in Pakistan. The &#8220;American mantra&#8221; that Osama bin Laden and the head of the Quetta shura are based there he rejects stubbornly like the country&#8217;s politicians. He goes on to rebut the picture painted by the Western media of the country with the examples of Sufis and Christians. Offended, and taking Western claims of a &#8220;failed state&#8221; too personal he acts like many Pakistanis do at the moment &#8211; negating reality, trying to paint over the failures rather than admitting them and offering home-grown solutions. Yesterday I watched a documentary on snow leopards in Chitral &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKm7Dmpt6Us&amp;feature=related">wonderful pictures, an amazing animal</a> -  where at one point notable journalist Nisar Malik understandebly laments, that the country is covered seldom for wonders like this natural one but mostly for terrorism. His contribution to get a better picture is this movie, but to just portray Pakistan as a natural paradise would hardly be the solution to its problems.</p>
<p>Of course the extreme adverse side of critics also does exist &#8211; Pakistani writers who continuously blame their own country (often including themselves as it&#8217;s citizens) for it&#8217;s current situation. Ahmed Rashid often does so, Pervez Hoodbhoy and Nadeem Paracha as well. I respect their assessments and find them constructive, in case of the latter they sometimes do tend to go into the all-destructive though.</p>
<p>Manan Ahmed on <a href="http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/potpurri/the_seth_jones_experience.html" target="_blank">chapatimystery</a> showed that coming up with conspiracy theories or offended negations is not necessary to counter the US push into Pakistan. He offers a straight confutation of a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/04/opinion/04jones.html?_r=1" target="_blank">NYTimes OpEd</a> by &#8220;one of the brains behind President Obama’s Afghanistan policy&#8221;, Seth Jones.</p>
<p>He also links to a hottly debated post at <a href="http://www.registan.net/index.php/2009/08/09/a-childrens-treasury-of-worthless-experts/" target="_blank">Registan</a> which not only bashes Jones but also Michael Semple on the article I <a href="http://pakchronicle.com/2009/12/04/sufilore-1-which-way-taliban/" target="_blank">recently</a> referred to. It sounds a bit harsh, I would have seen Semple in less critical light but Foust may be more informed (although some commenters disagree). His bashing of Kilcullen I would agree with though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rugpundits.com/2009/12/05/reason-vs-polemics-how-pakistani-intellectuals-face-the-looming-us-approach-on-their-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Hillary, which Pakistan are you talking about?</title>
		<link>http://rugpundits.com/2009/11/24/dear-hillary-which-pakistan-are-you-talking-about/</link>
		<comments>http://rugpundits.com/2009/11/24/dear-hillary-which-pakistan-are-you-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yasir Hussain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qalandar Bux Memon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakchronicle.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The image systematically created of Pakistan by these sources has an operative function of furthering US and Nato intervention in this region. The logic is simple but all the premises are false and based on a distortion of facts, history and most conceptions of justice – Christian, Islamic, liberal and Marxist.&#8221; Read further..
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The image systematically created of Pakistan by these sources has an operative function of furthering US and Nato intervention in this region. The logic is simple but all the premises are false and based on a distortion of facts, history and most conceptions of justice – Christian, Islamic, liberal and Marxist.&#8221; <a href="http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/03-Dear-Hillary-which-Pakistan-are-you-talking-about-ss-01" target="_blank">Read further..</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rugpundits.com/2009/11/24/dear-hillary-which-pakistan-are-you-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
